Back to Glossary
    📋 Audit & Assurance

    Engagement Quality Review

    Definition

    An independent review of significant audit judgments and the audit report by a qualified partner not involved in the engagement, required for public company audits and high-risk engagements.

    The engagement quality review (EQR), formerly known as a concurring partner review, is a critical quality control mechanism. It provides an independent check on the most significant decisions made during an audit.

    What Is an EQR?

    An EQR involves a qualified reviewer who:

    • Was not involved in the engagement
    • Evaluates significant judgments made by the engagement team
    • Reviews the audit report before issuance
    • Provides concurring approval for report release

    When Is an EQR Required?

    PCAOB Requirements

    • All audits of public companies (issuers)
    • All broker-dealer audits
    • Other engagements as determined by firm policy

    AICPA Requirements (QM Standards)

    • Engagements identified as having elevated quality risk
    • Based on firm's quality management system
    • May include: initial engagements, complex industries, high-risk clients

    EQR Reviewer Qualifications

    The reviewer must:

    • Be a partner or equivalent level
    • Have sufficient competence and experience
    • Not be involved in the engagement
    • Not have made significant engagement decisions
    • Maintain objectivity throughout the review
    • Complete required continuing education

    Scope of the Review

    Must Review

    • Significant risks identified and audit response
    • Significant judgments about materiality
    • Evaluation of uncorrected misstatements
    • Appropriateness of audit opinion
    • Going concern assessment
    • Significant unusual transactions
    • Critical audit matters (for PCAOB engagements)

    Documentation

    The EQR reviewer documents:

    • Procedures performed
    • Conclusions reached
    • Whether concurring approval is granted
    • Any matters discussed with the engagement partner

    EQR vs. Other Reviews

    Review TypeReviewerScopeTiming
    Detailed reviewManager/Senior ManagerAll workpapersThroughout engagement
    Engagement partner reviewEngagement partnerOverall engagementBefore report
    EQRIndependent partnerSignificant judgmentsBefore report release
    Peer reviewExternal firmFirm quality systemPeriodic (triennial)

    Best Practices

    1. Involve early: EQR reviewers should be consulted on significant issues as they arise
    2. Protect independence: Reviewer should not make engagement decisions
    3. Document thoroughly: Record all procedures and conclusions
    4. Allow sufficient time: Don't compress review into final days
    5. Candid dialogue: Encourage constructive challenge

    Related Terms

    Related searches:

    engagement quality reviewEQR auditconcurring partner reviewaudit quality review

    Explore More

    See Engagement Quality Review in Action

    CommandOS helps consulting firms master engagement quality review with AI-powered automation and real-time analytics.

    Start Free Trial